GLOBE Projects

GLOBE Side Navigation

Aquatic macroinvertebrates and their importance as water quality bioindicators in the Chimehuín River, Patagonia, Argentina.

Country:Argentina
Student(s):PEPE, Marianela MARTÍNEZ, Lucio Daniel WEHINGER, Juan
Grade Level:Secondary School (grades 9-12, ages 14-18)
GLOBE Educator(s):Ana Beatriz Prieto
Contributors:IMHOF, Jack
Report Type(s):
Protocols:Air Temperature, Precipitation, Wind, Soil Characterization, Soil Fertility, Soil Moisture - Gravimetric
Language(s):
Date Submitted:2018-02-24
Science Club logo
In 2015, the Calbuco volcano erupted depositing ashes in the region, with Junín de los Andes being the most affected area. Previously, in 2011, Puyehue volcano erupted scattering more ash, but this area was little affected. The Andes has numerous volcanoes that have generated great impacts on ecosystems and human activities: land and air transportation (at great distances), communications, infrastructure, agricultural activities, health, water sources. In summer 2015 an investigation of benthic macroinvertebrates in the Chimehuín River had been carried out, which served as a basis to study the effect generated by the perturbation of the fallen ashes. In summers 2016 and 2017 a sampling of water quality and macroinvertebrate populations was carried out in seven sites of the river Chimehuín to compare its state with the 2015 and to observe anthropic impacts and of the volcanic ashes. The results indicate verifiable alterations at five sampling sites that can be attributed to ashes but also coincide with areas that have historical anthropic impact (urban areas, campgrounds) and in areas where there were soil movements that increased disturbance. This impact was detected in macroinvertebrate populations most sensitive to changes in water quality.



Comments

Were the measurements of "Summer 2015" or "2015" collected before the eruption in April 2015?

- Joseph Lee
Yes. The measurements were taken from January to March 2015. The eruption of the Volcano was in April 2015.

We had planned to take more samples at other sites in April, but with the fall of ashes we could not because it was dangerous to our health.

Marianela, Lucio and Juan
Here is a research work well documented, easily readable and in which I can imagine that you have been involved with a lot of pleasure. I see very promising young researchers ...
Felicitaciones PEPE, Marianela, Lucio Daniel y Juan !! Thanks to your Teacher also for guiding you as well guys!
My question now : What made your study limited to public areas? Have you had difficulty accessing other sites? if so, what are their natures?
Thank you for your comments on our research project.

We chose public areas because they are the most affected because many people visit them, particularly in the summer, and they also have nearby roads that can drag pollutants with wind or runoff after the rains.

In the surroundings cattle are raised extensively (few animals per hectare), there are no crops (only a few greenhouses). In the private area there is little impact towards the river, except in the discharge of sewers. We take samples in a public area after the discharge of sewers to see their effect.

It is also difficult to get permission in all private sites to enter. In some places the owners do not live here, they only have employees.

Marianela, Lucio y Juan